Trending
    DJIA49,401-122-0.25%
    S&P 5006,844.00-7.00-0.10%
    NASDAQ24,757.75-10.25-0.04%
    Gold2,934.50+35.00+0.71%
    Silver77.770+2.088+2.76%
    Crude Oil63.17+0.33+0.53%
    BTC97,412+2,345+2.45%
    AAPL234.56-0.98-0.42%
    MSFT421.30+8.85+2.14%
    NVDA876.54+27.22+3.21%
    DJIA49,401-122-0.25%
    S&P 5006,844.00-7.00-0.10%
    NASDAQ24,757.75-10.25-0.04%
    Gold2,934.50+35.00+0.71%
    Silver77.770+2.088+2.76%
    Crude Oil63.17+0.33+0.53%
    BTC97,412+2,345+2.45%
    AAPL234.56-0.98-0.42%
    MSFT421.30+8.85+2.14%
    NVDA876.54+27.22+3.21%
    Politics

    Appeals Court Blocks Trump Executive Order on Mail-In Voting Regulations

    By TopHolding Editorial · Friday, July 31, 2026 at 9:01 PM

    Appeals Court Blocks Trump Executive Order on Mail-In Voting Regulations

    A federal appeals court ruled that President Trump lacks the authority to mandate new restrictive mail-in voting rules, siding with a coalition of 23 states.

    A federal appeals court has blocked President Donald Trump from enforcing an executive order that sought to tighten rules on mail-in voting. The court ruled that the administration lacked the legal authority to direct the Department of Homeland Security to compile voter eligibility lists or to mandate that the U.S. Postal Service only deliver ballots to state-approved lists. The decision sides with a coalition of 23 states, led by California and Massachusetts, which argued that states hold the constitutional power to administer federal elections.

    The ruling comes as the Trump administration continues to push for broader voting restrictions through Congress, including the SAVE America Act. In March, the administration had attempted to overhaul election procedures by requiring the USPS to implement new barcodes and tracking for mail-in ballots. However, Judge Talwani determined that these directives had no statutory authorization, effectively halting the administration's efforts to centralize control over mail-in ballot delivery and verification processes.

    Legal experts suggest the decision reaffirms the long-standing precedent that election administration is primarily a state-level responsibility. The administration had argued that federal oversight was necessary to ensure election integrity, but the court found that the executive branch cannot bypass existing laws that delegate these duties to local and state officials. This legal setback may shift the administration's focus toward legislative avenues as the midterm elections approach.